Skip to content

Games Officials Teams Research

About Ref Watch

Independent officiating analytics across professional sports. Ref Watch studies historical crew patterns for research, not predictions. Not affiliated with any league or sportsbook.

Explore

Basketball

NBA
WNBA
NCAA Basketball

Football (U.S.)

NFL
NCAA Football

Hockey

NHL

Football

Premier League
La Liga
Serie A
Ligue 1
Bundesliga

Trust & Methods

Referee analytics
Methodology
Validation
About
Compare

Company

Contact

Historical research only

Past patterns do not predict future outcomes. Ref Watch does not provide betting advice.

Need help? 1-866-531-2600 · ConnexOntario, 24/7

© 2026 Ref Watch

Privacy Terms Accessibility Data policy

Rutgers Scarlet Knights

How the Scarlet Knights play under each referee

Every Scarlet Knights game grouped by individual referee. Over this sample the Scarlet Knights are 97-95 (50.5%); each ref win rate below is compared to that team average.

Updated Aug 22, 2026, 9:10 p.m.·2020-2026 (2020-11-26 – 2026-04-03)

Scarlet Knights record: 97-95 (50.5%)

Officials with enough games overlap across crews; combined team-official games (362) exceed 192 unique team matches. Table lists refs with 8+ games.

Sort by

#RefWin ratevs baselineClose gamesOpponent whistle volume minus team volume per game. Positive means your team is whistled less (or the opponent more), a favorable minors/flags edge.

Rob Kueneman
+29.5 pts vs team-1.4
Brooks Wells
+19.5 pts vs team+0.2
Bill Ek
+16.2 pts vs team-2.2
Brandon Cruz
+16.2 pts vs team+0.3
Edwin Young
+12.0 pts vs team-1.2
Kelly Pfeifer
+9.5 pts vs team-1.0
Jeffrey Anderson
+6.6 pts vs team-1.6
James Breeding
+5.1 pts vs team+1.1
Larry Scirotto
+4.5 pts vs team+2.2
Lewis Garrison
+4.0 pts vs team+1.5
Robert Riley
+2.8 pts vs team-0.7
Brian Dorsey
+1.5 pts vs team-1.9
Steve McJunkins
-0.5 pts vs team+1.1
Randy Richardson
-0.5 pts vs team-1.4
D.J. Carstensen
-1.9 pts vs team+0.3
Courtney Green
-4.3 pts vs team+1.0
Keith Kimble
-5.0 pts vs team+1.2
Tim Comer
-5.0 pts vs team-3.0
Earl Walton
-6.1 pts vs team+0.1
Paul Szelc
-8.4 pts vs team+0.0
Doug Sirmons
-10.5 pts vs team+2.6
Bo Boroski
-17.2 pts vs team+2.4

Tight-game proxy

How Rutgers Scarlet Knights compares in tight final-margin games vs the full sample. Based on official box scores, not last-two-minute reports.

Close games (≤5 pt margin)

55 of 192 games match this window

Avg combined points
Tight-game avg
142.1
Season avg
139
Pressure impact
+3.1
Avg fouls
Tight-game avg
34.3
Season avg
33.6
Pressure impact
+0.7
Over rate
Tight-game avg
43.6%
Season avg
35.4%
Pressure impact
+8.2 pp

Over benchmark: 145.3 combined points · Seasons: 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26 · 192 total games in sample

Pregame toss-ups (spread ≤5.5)

64 of 192 games match this window

Avg combined points
Toss-up avg
135.1
Season avg
139
Pressure impact
-3.9
Avg fouls
Toss-up avg
32.7
Season avg
33.6
Pressure impact
-0.9
Over rate
Toss-up avg
29.7%
Season avg
35.4%
Pressure impact
-5.7 pp

Over benchmark: 145.3 combined points · Seasons: 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26 · 192 total games in sample

What am I looking at?

Individual refs: stats for one official across all Scarlet Knights games they worked, even with different partners.
Team baseline: the Scarlet Knights went 97-95 (50.5%) across this sample. Ref win rates show how they compare to that team average.
Whistle differential: who gets called more. A positive number means opponents are whistled more often than the Scarlet Knights.

Scores, fouls, and referee crews from ESPN (9885 games across 80 tracked programs, 6047 with sportsbook totals). Coverage: 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26. Matrix: 4078/8349 ref×team pairs with 3+ games. 69 games skipped (no officials listed). 0 games skipped (outside live conference gate). Ref game counts rebuilt from DISTINCT game_id in game logs.