NFL insights
Tendency index, league-wide trends, and ranked dataset findings in one place.
Historical scoring and whistle tendencies across qualified officials. Descriptive associations with league baselines, not predictions. Sample: 175 officials (2021-09-10 – 2026-02-08).
Who moves the points?
The 140 officials with 30+ games, ranked by historical associations in their games.
Biggest scoring bump
Jerry Bergman+3.0 G
He averages 3.0 more combined points than the league baseline in his games.
Highest historical over-rate vs baseline
Jeff Hutcheon56.8%
Line benchmark is 43.3 combined points; he clears it more often than peers in this sample.
Heaviest flags ref
Ron Torbert+4.2
He runs 4.2 flags thrown above average per game.
60 of 140 officials associate with higher scoring. 41 associate with lower totals. Numbers describe past games, not predictions for tonight.
| # | Official | Signals | Yards Δ | Balance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | +3.0 | -1.5 | 54.8% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 2 | 90 | +2.6 | +0.4 | 52.2% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 3 | 46 | +2.5 | -0.2 | 45.7% | 3 notable | - | - | |
| 4 | 40 | +2.3 | +1.5 | 50.0% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 5 | 50 | +2.2 | +0.6 | 50.0% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 6 | Alex Moore#124 | 69 | +2.0 | +4.2 | 52.2% | +30.9 | asymmetric | |
| 7 | 34 | +2.0 | +0.0 | 55.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 8 | 89 | +2.0 | +0.1 | 52.8% | - | - | ||
| 9 | 89 | +1.9 | -0.4 | 52.8% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 10 | 82 | +1.9 | -0.8 | 48.8% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 11 | 87 | +1.9 | -0.7 | 51.7% | - | - | ||
| 12 | 38 | +1.8 | +0.5 | 47.4% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 13 | 85 | +1.7 | -0.4 | 48.2% | - | - | ||
| 14 | 32 | +1.6 | +1.6 | 46.9% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 15 | 83 | +1.5 | +1.4 | 48.2% | - | - | ||
| 16 | 86 | +1.5 | -0.4 | 50.0% | - | - | ||
| 17 | 69 | +1.5 | -1.0 | 55.1% | - | - | ||
| 18 | 37 | +1.4 | +0.1 | 56.8% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 19 | 71 | +1.3 | -0.3 | 47.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 20 | 86 | +1.2 | +0.8 | 48.8% | - | - | ||
| 21 | 77 | +1.2 | -0.3 | 45.5% | - | - | ||
| 22 | 54 | +1.2 | +0.6 | 51.9% | - | - | ||
| 23 | 32 | +1.2 | -1.4 | 46.9% | - | - | ||
| 24 | 81 | +1.2 | +0.3 | 48.1% | - | - | ||
| 25 | 72 | +1.1 | -0.4 | 48.6% | - | - | ||
| 26 | 73 | +1.1 | -0.7 | 43.8% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 27 | 89 | +1.1 | +0.6 | 55.1% | - | - | ||
| 28 | 59 | +1.1 | +1.1 | 49.2% | - | - | ||
| 29 | Brad Rogers#126 | 381 | +1.0 | +0.5 | 56.2% | 2 notable | +5.5 | asymmetric |
| 30 | Bryan Neale#92 | 277 | +1.0 | +3.7 | 56.0% | 2 notable | - | - |
| 31 | 74 | +1.0 | +0.1 | 48.6% | - | - | ||
| 32 | 90 | +1.0 | -0.4 | 45.6% | - | - | ||
| 33 | 333 | +0.9 | +0.5 | 52.6% | 2 notable | +5.5 | asymmetric | |
| 34 | Carl Johnson#101 | 327 | +0.9 | +3.7 | 55.4% | 3 notable | - | - |
| 35 | 31 | +0.9 | -1.2 | 41.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 36 | Adrian Hill#29 | 614 | +0.8 | +0.8 | 54.7% | 1 notable | +7.9 | asymmetric |
| 37 | 82 | +0.8 | +1.3 | 45.1% | - | - | ||
| 38 | Shawn Smith#14 | 489 | +0.8 | -0.5 | 53.6% | 1 notable | -5.0 | asymmetric |
| 39 | 92 | +0.7 | -0.8 | 43.5% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 40 | 96 | +0.7 | +0.2 | 49.0% | - | - | ||
| 41 | 87 | +0.7 | -0.2 | 46.0% | - | - | ||
| 42 | Ron Torbert#62 | 224 | +0.7 | +4.2 | 54.0% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 43 | 566 | +0.7 | +3.9 | 52.7% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 44 | 85 | +0.6 | -0.1 | 51.8% | - | - | ||
| 45 | Mark Hittner#28 | 276 | +0.6 | +4.1 | 51.4% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 46 | 95 | +0.5 | +0.9 | 48.4% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 47 | 236 | +0.5 | -0.9 | 53.8% | 2 notable | -10.5 | asymmetric | |
| 48 | Clay Martin#19 | 314 | +0.5 | -0.2 | 52.5% | 1 notable | +0.5 | asymmetric |
| 49 | 453 | +0.5 | +0.6 | 50.3% | 1 notable | +4.0 | asymmetric | |
| 50 | 91 | +0.5 | -0.3 | 47.3% | -0.7 | asymmetric | ||
| 51 | David Moore#124 | 454 | +0.5 | +3.9 | 52.0% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 52 | Jerome Boger#23 | 328 | +0.5 | +3.9 | 51.8% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 53 | John Hussey#35 | 223 | +0.5 | -1.2 | 52.0% | 2 notable | -9.4 | asymmetric |
| 54 | 228 | +0.5 | +0.8 | 51.8% | 1 notable | +10.3 | asymmetric | |
| 55 | 89 | +0.5 | +0.4 | 49.4% | - | - | ||
| 56 | Brad Allen#122 | 290 | +0.4 | -0.6 | 50.7% | 1 notable | -10.3 | asymmetric |
| 57 | 89 | +0.4 | +0.9 | 44.9% | - | - | ||
| 58 | 90 | +0.4 | +0.9 | 46.7% | - | - | ||
| 59 | 88 | +0.4 | -0.7 | 46.6% | - | - | ||
| 60 | 48 | +0.4 | -0.1 | 47.9% | - | - | ||
| 61 | 520 | +0.3 | +4.0 | 50.4% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 62 | 79 | +0.3 | +1.1 | 39.2% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 63 | 98 | +0.3 | -0.1 | 54.1% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 64 | 92 | +0.3 | -0.8 | 48.9% | - | - | ||
| 65 | Land Clark#130 | 649 | +0.3 | +0.1 | 50.2% | 1 notable | +0.3 | asymmetric |
| 66 | Landry Malloy#116 | 513 | +0.3 | +3.9 | 49.5% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 67 | 52 | +0.3 | -1.9 | 44.2% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 68 | 87 | +0.3 | +0.2 | 47.1% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 69 | 93 | +0.3 | +0.0 | 46.2% | -0.5 | asymmetric | ||
| 70 | 335 | +0.3 | +0.0 | 50.4% | 1 notable | -2.2 | asymmetric | |
| 71 | Sean Smith#14 | 378 | +0.3 | +4.1 | 48.7% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 72 | 359 | +0.2 | +3.9 | 47.6% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 73 | Alan Eck#76 | 461 | +0.2 | -0.9 | 48.6% | 3 notable | -4.3 | asymmetric |
| 74 | 79 | +0.2 | -0.6 | 46.8% | - | - | ||
| 75 | 89 | +0.2 | +0.2 | 44.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 76 | 82 | +0.1 | -0.3 | 47.6% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 77 | 86 | +0.1 | +0.5 | 43.0% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 78 | 71 | +0.1 | -0.1 | 47.9% | - | - | ||
| 79 | 94 | +0.1 | +1.2 | 45.7% | - | - | ||
| 80 | 91 | +0.1 | -0.1 | 48.4% | - | - | ||
| 81 | 79 | +0.1 | -0.2 | 48.1% | - | - | ||
| 82 | 46 | +0.0 | -1.0 | 41.3% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 83 | 83 | +0.0 | +0.4 | 45.8% | - | - | ||
| 84 | 89 | +0.0 | +0.0 | 46.1% | - | - | ||
| 85 | 85 | +0.0 | +0.5 | 44.7% | - | - | ||
| 86 | 292 | -0.1 | +0.2 | 50.3% | 1 notable | +1.1 | asymmetric | |
| 87 | 74 | -0.1 | -0.6 | 45.9% | - | - | ||
| 88 | 88 | -0.1 | +0.9 | 45.5% | - | - | ||
| 89 | 93 | -0.1 | +0.8 | 45.2% | - | - | ||
| 90 | 69 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 50.7% | - | - | ||
| 91 | 86 | -0.2 | +0.6 | 41.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 92 | 33 | -0.2 | +0.2 | 48.5% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 93 | 82 | -0.2 | +0.2 | 45.1% | - | - | ||
| 94 | 100 | -0.2 | +0.4 | 46.0% | - | - | ||
| 95 | 84 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 46.4% | - | - | ||
| 96 | 91 | -0.3 | +0.0 | 44.0% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 97 | 89 | -0.3 | +0.4 | 42.7% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 98 | 91 | -0.3 | +0.0 | 45.1% | - | - | ||
| 99 | 67 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 44.8% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 100 | 95 | -0.4 | +0.4 | 46.3% | - | - | ||
| 101 | 92 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 48.9% | - | - | ||
| 102 | 88 | -0.5 | +0.1 | 47.7% | - | - | ||
| 103 | 84 | -0.6 | -0.6 | 44.0% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 104 | 80 | -0.6 | +0.1 | 50.0% | - | - | ||
| 105 | 86 | -0.7 | -0.9 | 45.3% | - | - | ||
| 106 | 55 | -0.7 | -0.4 | 49.1% | - | - | ||
| 107 | 83 | -0.7 | +0.6 | 44.6% | - | - | ||
| 108 | 54 | -0.7 | +1.4 | 40.7% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 109 | 85 | -0.8 | +0.7 | 42.4% | 1 notable | +6.5 | asymmetric | |
| 110 | 91 | -0.8 | -1.0 | 46.2% | - | - | ||
| 111 | 52 | -0.9 | -1.2 | 44.2% | - | - | ||
| 112 | 82 | -0.9 | -0.4 | 37.8% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 113 | 90 | -0.9 | -0.2 | 42.2% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 114 | 46 | -1.0 | -0.5 | 45.7% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 115 | 84 | -1.0 | -0.8 | 41.7% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 116 | 84 | -1.1 | +1.0 | 44.0% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 117 | 93 | -1.1 | +0.0 | 50.5% | - | - | ||
| 118 | 88 | -1.1 | +0.0 | 44.3% | - | - | ||
| 119 | 91 | -1.2 | +0.1 | 39.6% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 120 | 56 | -1.3 | +0.9 | 39.3% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 121 | 36 | -1.3 | +1.5 | 41.7% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 122 | 51 | -1.3 | +1.0 | 43.1% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 123 | 92 | -1.4 | -0.4 | 41.3% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 124 | 70 | -1.5 | +0.6 | 41.4% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 125 | 52 | -1.5 | -0.2 | 44.2% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 126 | Tom Hill#29 | 59 | -1.5 | +0.5 | 40.7% | 1 notable | - | - |
| 127 | 78 | -1.6 | +0.5 | 35.9% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 128 | 75 | -1.6 | +0.9 | 40.0% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 129 | 88 | -1.8 | -0.8 | 39.8% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 130 | 36 | -1.9 | +0.5 | 38.9% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 131 | 78 | -2.0 | +0.3 | 41.0% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 132 | 87 | -2.0 | -0.2 | 41.4% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 133 | 31 | -2.1 | -1.0 | 45.2% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 134 | 52 | -2.1 | +0.4 | 34.6% | 1 notable | - | - | |
| 135 | 85 | -2.4 | -0.8 | 40.0% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 136 | Chad Hill#29 | 89 | -2.6 | -0.4 | 39.3% | 2 notable | - | - |
| 137 | 52 | -3.2 | -1.2 | 36.5% | 4 notable | - | - | |
| 138 | 53 | -3.3 | -0.6 | 39.6% | 3 notable | - | - | |
| 139 | 33 | -3.6 | +0.2 | 36.4% | 2 notable | - | - | |
| 140 | 57 | -3.8 | -1.1 | 36.8% | 2 notable | - | - |
Ref Watch Pro (coming soon), automated slate alerts, deeper crew reunion stats, and expanded officiating intelligence feeds.